Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

º¹ÇÕ ·¹ÁøÀÇ °£ÇæÀû ±¤ÁßÇÕ ¹æ¹ýÀÌ ÁßÇÕ ¼öÃà ¼Óµµ¿Í Ä¡¾ÆÀÇ ±³µÎ º¯À§¿¡ ¹ÌÄ¡´Â ¿µÇâ

EFFECT OF INTERMITTENT POLYMERIZATION ON THE RATE OF POLYMERIZATION SHRINKAGE AND CUSPAL DEFLECTION IN COMPOSITE RESIN

´ëÇÑÄ¡°úº¸Á¸ÇÐȸÁö 2008³â 33±Ç 4È£ p.341 ~ 351
±è¹Î°æ, ¹Ú¼ºÈ£, ¼­´ö±Ô, ¼ÛÀ±Á¤, ÀÌÀ±, ÀÌÂù¿µ,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
±è¹Î°æ ( Kim Min-Kyung ) - ¿¬¼¼´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ Ä¡°úº¸Á¸Çб³½Ç
¹Ú¼ºÈ£ ( Park Sung-Ho ) - ¿¬¼¼´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ º¸Á¸Çб³½Ç
¼­´ö±Ô ( Seo Deog-Gyu ) - ¿¬¼¼´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ Ä¡°úº¸Á¸Çб³½Ç
¼ÛÀ±Á¤ ( Song Yun-Jung ) - ¿¬¼¼´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ Ä¡°úº¸Á¸Çб³½Ç
ÀÌÀ± ( Lee Yoon ) - ¿¬¼¼´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ Ä¡°úº¸Á¸Çб³½Ç
ÀÌÂù¿µ ( Lee Chan-Young ) - ¿¬¼¼´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ Ä¡°úº¸Á¸Çб³½Ç

Abstract

Áö±Ý±îÁö ´Ù¼öÀÇ ¿¬±¸Àڵ鿡 ÀÇÇØ ±¤ÁßÇÕÇü º¹ÇÕ ·¹ÁøÀ» ÁßÇÕÇÏ´Â ¹æ¹ý¿¡ À־ ±¤Á¶»ç °­µµ, ½Ã°£À» Á¶ÀýÇÏ¿© ÁßÇÕ¼öÃàÀÇ ¼Óµµ¸¦ °¨¼Ò½ÃÅ°±â À§ÇÑ ½Ãµµ°¡ ÀÖ¾úÀ¸³ª, °£ÇæÀû ÁßÇÕ¹ý¿¡ °üÇÑ ±¸Ã¼ÀûÀÎ ¿¬±¸°¡ ºÎÁ·ÇÏ´Ù. ÀÌ¿¡ ÀúÀÚ´Â ±¤ÁßÇÕ º¹ÇÕ ·¹ÁøÀ» °£ÇæÀûÀ¸·Î ±¤ÁßÇÕ½ÃÄÑ ±âÁ¸ÀÇ ¿¬¼Ó ÁßÇÕ¹ý°ú ºñ±³ÇÏ¿© ÁßÇÕ ¼öÃàÀÇ ¼Óµµ¸¦ ÃøÁ¤ÇÏ°í ±³µÎ º¯À§¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ¿µÇâÀ» Æò°¡ÇØ º¸°íÀÚ ÇÏ¿´´Ù. ½ÇÇè¿¡ »ç¿ëµÈ ¼öº¹ Àç·á´Â 2Á¾ÀÇ ±¤ÁßÇÕÇü º¹ÇÕ ·¹ÁøÀ¸·Î Heliomolar¿Í PyramidÀ̸ç, ÁßÇÕ ¼öÃà·®À» ÃøÁ¤Çϱâ À§ÇØ ÀÚü Á¦ÀÛÇÑ Linometer (R&B Inc., Daejon, Korea)À» »ç¿ëÇÏ¿´°í ±¤ÁßÇսà ±¤Á¶»ç Â÷´ÜÀåÄ¡¸¦ ½ÃÆí°ú Linometer »çÀÌ¿¡ À§Ä¡½ÃÄÑ °¢°¢ÀÇ ¼­·Î ´Ù¸¥ ÁßÇÕ ÁÖ±â: (1) ¿¬¼Ó ±¤ÁßÇÕ (60ÃÊ°£ °è¼Ó ±¤Á¶»ç); (2) 2ÃÊ ±¤Á¶»ç, 1ÃÊ ±¤Â÷´Ü (90ÃÊ ½ÃÇà), (3) 1ÃÊ ±¤Á¶»ç, 1ÃÊ ±¤Â÷´Ü (120ÃÊ ½ÃÇà), (4) 1ÃÊ ±¤Á¶»ç, 2ÃÊ ±¤Â÷´Ü (180ÃÊ ½ÃÇà)·Î ÁßÇÕ½ÃÄ×´Ù. ±º º°·Î Á¶»çµÈ ÃÑ¿¡³ÊÁö·®ÀÌ µ¿ÀÏÇϵµ·Ï ÁßÇÕ ½Ã°£À» Á¶ÀýÇÏ¿´°í, ÃÖÁ¾ ÁßÇÕ ¼öÃà·®À» ÃøÁ¤ÇÏ¿´À¸¸ç ÁßÇÕ ¼öÃàÀÇ ÃÖ°í¼Óµµ ()¿Í ÃÖ°í¼Óµµ¸¦ ³ªÅ¸³½ peak time (PT)À» °è»êÇÏ¿´´Ù. ±³µÎ º¯À§ÀÇ ÃøÁ¤À» À§Çؼ­´Â °¢ ±ºº°·Î 10°³ÀÇ °ÇÀüÇÑ »ó¾Ç ¼Ò±¸Ä¡¿¡ º¯Çü½ÃŲ Á¦2±Þ ¿Íµ¿À» Çü¼ºÇÑ ´ÙÀ½ »ó¾ÆÁú Á¢ÂøÁ¦¸¦ µµÆ÷ÇÏ°í ÀÏÁ¤·®ÀÇ º¹ÇÕ ·¹ÁøÀ» ÃæÀüÇÑ ÈÄ Ä¡¾Æ¸¦ ÀÚü Á¦ÀÛµÈ Ä¡¾Æ º¯À§ ÃøÁ¤±â (R&B Inc., Daejon, Korea)¿¡ À§Ä¡½ÃÄÑ ±³µÎ º¯À§¾çÀ» ¾Ë¾Æº¸¾Ò´Ù. Åë°èºÐ¼®Àº ANOVA test¸¦ ÀÌ¿ëÇÏ¿© ±º °£ÀÇ ºñ±³¸¦ ÇÏ¿´°í, Àç·á°£ÀÇ ºñ±³¸¦ À§Çؼ­´Â t-test¸¦ ½ÃÇàÇÏ¿´´Ù. ½ÇÇè °á°ú´Â 1) ¼±¼öÃà·®Àº ±º °£¿¡ Â÷ÀÌ°¡ ¾ø¾ú°í (p > 0.05), Pyramid°¡ Heliomolarº¸´Ù ÁßÇÕ ¼öÃà·®ÀÌ ÄÇ´Ù (p < 0.05). Peak timeÀº Heliomolar¿Í Pyramid ·¹Áø ¸ðµÎ¿¡¼­ °£ÇæÀû ±¤ÁßÇսà ´õ ´Ê°Ô ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù. ´Â Heliomolar´Â 4±º < 3±º, 2±º < 1±º ¼øÀ̾ú°í, Pyramid´Â 3±º < 4±º < 2±º, 1±º ¼øÀ¸·Î ÃøÁ¤µÇ¾ú´Ù. 2) Heliomolar´Â 4±º < 3±º < 2, 1±º ±×¸®°í Pyramid´Â 4, 3±º < 2, 1±º ¼øÀ¸·Î ±³µÎ º¯À§°¡ ÄÇÀ¸¸ç (p < 0.05), Pyramid°¡ Heliomolarº¸´Ù ±³µÎ º¯À§°¡ Å©°Ô ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù (p < 0.05). À̹ø ½ÇÇèÀ» ÅëÇØ º¹ÇÕ ·¹ÁøÀ» ±¤Á¶»ç Â÷´ÜÀåÄ¡¸¦ ÀÌ¿ëÇÏ¿© °£ÇæÀû ±¤ÁßÇÕ½ÃÄÑ ÁßÇÕ¼öÃà ¼Óµµ¸¦ ´ÊÃãÀ¸·Î½á ±³µÎ º¯À§ ¾çÀÌ °¨¼ÒµÊÀ» ¾Ë ¼ö ÀÖ¾ú´Ù.

This study investigated the effect of intermittent polymerization on the rate of polymerization shrinkage and cuspal deflection in composite resins. The linear polymerization shrinkage of each composite was measured using the custom-made linometer along with the light shutter specially devised to block the light at the previously determined interval. Samples were divided into 4 groups by light curing method; Group 1) continuous light (60s with light on); Group 2) intermittent light (cycles of 3s with 2s light on & 1s with light off for 90s): Group 3) intermittent light (cycles of 2s with 1s light on & 1s with light off for 120s); Group 4) intermittent light (cycles of 3s with 1s light on & 2s with light off for 180s). The amount of linear polymerization shrinkage was measured and its maximum rate (Rmax) and peak time (PT) in the first 15 seconds were calculated. For the measurement of cuspal deflection of teeth, MOD cavities were prepared in 10 extracted maxillary premolars. Reduction in the intercuspal distance was measured by the custom-made cuspal deflection measuring machine. ANOVA analysis was used for the comparison of the light curing groups and t-test was used to determine significant difference between the composite resins. Pyramid showed the greater amount of polymerization shrinkage than Heliomolar (p < 0.05). There was no significant difference in the linear polymerization shrinkage among the groups. The Rmax was group 4 < 3, 2 < 1 in Heliomolar and group 3 < 4 < 2, 1 in Pyramid (p < 0.05). Pyramid demonstrated greater cuspal deflection than Heliomolar. The cuspal deflection in Heliomolar was group 4 < 3 < 2, 1 and group 4, 3 < 2, 1 in Pyramid (p < 0.05). It was concluded that the reduced rate of polymerization shrinkage by intermittent polymerization can help to decrease the cuspal deflection.

Å°¿öµå

°£ÇæÀû ±¤ÁßÇÕ;ÁßÇÕ ¼öÃà ¼Óµµ;±³µÎ º¯À§;º¹ÇÕ ·¹Áø
Intermittent polymerization;Rate of polymerization shrinkage;Cuspal deflection;Composite resin

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

 

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KCI